Monday, March 29, 2010

Pounds Off Profile: Ken Griffey, Jr.

It’s a baseball rite of spring.  Left and right, players are “in the best shape in years” or “experimenting with a new pitch” or “injury-free for the first time in years”.   Like suddenly Greg Gross is going to turn into the second coming of Chuck Klein. 

This spring’s “miracle” ballplayer weight loss, among others, belongs to none other than Ken Griffey, Jr., for – are you sitting down?  – dropping seven pounds riding an (expensive!) exercise bike and eating healthy foods.  But Junior, seven pounds all winter?  At least go for double digits!*

* I have two early memories of Junior.  I didn’t move to Seattle until 1994, so I had an outsider’s lens his first five seasons with the M’s.  My first was my dear friend Ted Shuster (RIP) who saw Griffey in some late night telecast and nagged me about how sweet Junior’s swing was until I promised to watch a Mariners game.  The second was a little off the beaten path.  I went through a period of reading the Bill Mazeroski baseball guide every spring, pretty much cover to cover.  One year, while spending spring break with my Grandma and Grandpa Quinlan in Buffalo**, I read a scout’s take, something like: “Griffey needs to watch his weight.  He has gained five pounds a year, and if he keeps this up...”  For some reason, that little passage has never left me.  This year, I guess it’s Griffey who  gets the last laugh.

** Yes, during my college years I spent spring break in Buffalo.  Not exactly Daytona Beach, but four winters in Rochester will soften up your expectations pretty good.

Sunday, March 28, 2010

Pounds Off Profile: Charlie Manuel

Phillies manager Charlie Manuel has always been an interesting cat.  He seemed like a terrible fit at first, a country bumpkin in blue collar Philly.  In the end, he turned out to be a great match for the team, bringing Philadelphia its first championship in 25 years.

The life of a manager was taking its toll on Charlie’s health, though.  Read how he lost 58 pounds in the off season!  We often hear how a ballplayer has reported to spring training in “the best shape in years”.  This time, it’s the manager, and this time, it’s true!

Week 10 Recap: Good Fortune with Whole Foods

Week 10 Loss: 1.1 Pounds
Total Loss: 15.3 Pounds

It’s amazing how easy following “no processed food” is, or at least how easy greatly reducing processed foods is.  No, you don’t get much help from modern American society, but once you stop eating refined carbohydrates, added sugars, and diet sodas, it’s amazing how quickly you start looking forward to an orange like you used to look forward to an Orange Creamsicle. 

My staples these two weeks have included salads, egg whites, chicken breasts, brown rice, nuts, high fiber cereals, and fruits.  I have eaten more fruits and vegetables in the last two weeks than in quite a while, and had no “disasters”.  It’s pretty difficult, really, to ingest a lot of calories in a short period of time without eating processed foods. 

And I’m feeling good and in control.  As a case in point, one night this week we had a tense evening meeting at work, a situation that could easily left me stressed and headed for 1000 plus calories after 9:00 p.m.   The situation itself is immaterial (let’s just say it resembled a bad high school marching band rehearsal).  Afterward, I chose to unwind by stopping off at Trader Joe’s and loading up on egg whites, tomatoes, reduced fat cottage cheese, and high fiber cereal.  It was as if by rejecting stress eating, I was rejecting the stress – strangely empowering.

Let me end with a quick story.  Early in the week, I ate at a Chinese restaurant.  I had tofu with vegetables and brown rice (yes, Dad, tofu; go ahead and gloat).  At the end of the meal a fortune cookie arrived with the bill.  Fortune cookies, though small and not the reason I got up to a bazillion pounds, fit the processed food category, so I skipped it.  But I wanted the insight, wit, and wisdom that comes on that little slip of paper inside.  So I opened it and read the fortune while casting aside the cookie.  First, I read the back, which said something like “Be counted! www.census.gov”.  Really?  The front said, “Your health is improving”.  Let’s hope they know what they’re talking about!*

* Friday I got Chinese takeout –lots of sautéed vegetables with some chicken and shrimp and no rice.  The fortune said, “You will soon receive good news.”  That afternoon we learned that we got the grant I told you about in the Week 6 Recap.  How did the fortune cookie writers know?   It’s a mystery...

Coaching point:  To borrow a phrase, just do it.  Put down processed food and pick up whole foods.  After a few days, the things you thought you couldn’t live with become just an afterthought.  And if you’re eating more naturally, your body will do the rest.  

Saturday, March 27, 2010

High Fructose Corn Syrup

Articles on CNN.com and Salon.com this week describe a new study from Princeton University on sweetners. Preliminary results find that rats gain more weight and belly fat when high fructose corn syrup is used as the sweetener, rather than cane sugar.  Some question the methodology of the study and both articles point out that the bigger problem isn’t finding the healthier sugar, but cutting down on sugar consumption of any kind.

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Processed Carbs and the Dietary Guidelines

Slate ran an article today that makes a good point about processed carbohydrates and the upcoming revision of the HHS/USDA Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Main point: American have replaced fat - in the interest of health - with low fat processed carbs, but health effects haven't materialized and waistlines continue to expand.

Sunday, March 21, 2010

Week 9 Recap: Satchel Would Approve

Week 9 Loss: 2.8 Pounds
Total Loss: 14.2 Pounds

“Don’t eat fried food.  It angries up the blood.”
 – Leroy “Satchel” Paige

Satchel died more than a quarter century ago, before most of our modern processed foods were pervasive, in large quantities, at low cost.  But I suspect he’d offer similar advice for the things I gave up a week ago:  whites (bread, crackers, rice, pasta, etc.), sweets, processed meats and cheese, and diet colas. 

I’ve been more aware of this plan than the previous plans.  First of all, you have to give up some things and generally work harder to find whole foods.  I went to our Mariner ticket party and skipped the normal fare – hot dogs, chips, and Cracker Jacks – in favor of grapes and bean soup, among many examples.  For better or worse, it’s hard to slip into “normal” eating mode.  For a while, I felt some withdrawal from those “predigested” foods.   But then I noticed that I don’t want to eat at night.  Filling up on whole foods really is filling.

To be honest, “no” processed food doesn’t really mean zero, just a huge reduction.  I’ve made an exception for a couple of the least processed cereals, without which the decline in carbohydrates would be more dramatic than I could handle.  The same goes for Trader Joe’s brown rice, which comes cooked and frozen (we love it).  I’ve had some sauces and salad dressing that I’m sure extreme natural food types would dismiss.  And try as I might, a couple of times I found myself in a situation where processed food was unavoidable, such as when I was with others rushing to a lunchtime meeting in the next county. I had a drive-thru chicken sandwich (but no fries, Satchel).  Ironically, it gave me a stomach ache.  Karma, as they say. 

Coaching point:  Diets can be confusing.  Many well known approaches offer differing, sometimes contradictory, advice.  When you’re looking for clarity, one way to find it is to look to food that is as close to its natural state as possible.  Most of the bad decisions you can make when eating, such as eating a lot of calories in a short period of time or consuming too much fat, sugar, and salt, are easily managed when staying with whole foods. 

Phor Phillies Phans

If you’re here because you’re interested in weight loss, you may want to move on to the next post.  But if you’re here for the other themes: sports, Philly roots, and the wonder of brackets, you’ll recognize immediately why I just had to link to The Phield, which is holding a tournament of 65 Phillies blogs, with winners determined by fan voting.  (Yes, sixty-five. Who knew?)

The only ones I have read on occasion are The 700 Level* and Crashburn Alley.  “Crashburn” of course pays homage to legendary Phillies centerfielder and longtime broadcaster Richie Ashburn.  Ashburn’s pal Harry Kalas is likewise honored with Long Drive, Swing and a Long Drive, That Balls Outta Here, and High Hopes.

My favorite Phillies blog name is The Curse of Billy Penn, which refers to the 25 year period, from the 76ers in 1983 to the Phillies 2008, when 100 combined pro sports seasons passed without a Philly championship.  Superstition attributed the quarter century of agony to One Liberty Place’s violation of the unwritten rule that no building exceed the top of the William Penn statue atop City Hall.  Construction workers placed a short replica of the statue atop the new Comcast Center, lifting the “curse” in 2007, a year before the Phillies defeated the Rays. So a good blog name, but as a 13 seed, it’s not likely The Curse of Billy Penn will celebrate its own championship. 

* If you’ve read this far, I probably don’t need to explain that the 700 level was the infamous ring of cheap yellow seats atop (infamous) Veterans Stadium.  That’s where we usually sat.  When I first went to a game in 1978 with my Dad and Grandpa Spicciati, general admission was $2.50 for adults and .50 for kids.  My last trip to the 700 level was with Shannon, where we were witness to a touching scene – unique to Philadelphia  – where a mom and dad were teaching their three year old daughter to boo.  (Hey, you can’t leave the transmission of important cultural norms to the public schools.)

Sunday, March 14, 2010

Eating Plan Profile: No Processed Food

Quick: Name three “junk” foods. Now, name three diets that people swear by. Got them?

For the former, perhaps you named a snack chip, fast food item, and any sugary soda. For the latter, you could have identified the Atkins, Okinawa, and Mediterranean diets. Now, try to find a common thread. The foods are salty and sweet, from grocery stores and from restaurants. The diets, all of which have legitimate claims to success, are as different as day and night. Atkins is a protein diet, with restrictions on carbohydrate intake. The Mediterranean diet is known by its healthy fats, such as olive oil. And the Okinawa diet, based on the study of uber-healthy seniors in Japan, deduces the value of rice and fish. The common thread? It might just be modern food science.

As traditional cultures have remained thin and healthy, such as in the Mediterranean and Okinawa examples above, modern Western cultures, and Americans in particular, are getting fatter at alarming rates. While there are many candidates for blame – ranging from prosperity, to the hectic pace of modern life, to inactivity – a consensus is forming around the plentiful and easy to absorb calories consumed in processed foods.

Many have advised against modern processed foods, and I’ll offer two spokespeople here. Michael Pollan is among the leading voices against what he describes as “edible food-like substances” and in favor of what he calls, to use a technical term, “food”. The easiest distinction between the two might be that your grandmother would recognize the latter, but not the former. If you haven’t read one of Pollan’s books, I highly recommend it. Last year, I read In Defense of Food, which offers the advice “Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants.” You should really read the whole book, but Pollan offers the introduction for free on his web site.

For a more humorous take on all of this, I’ll refer you to John Durant’s appearance on The Colbert Report. Though a resident of New York City, Durant is known for his hunter-gatherer or “caveman” diet. The same principle applies as with Pollan’s teaching – modern food has evolved beyond our bodies’ ability to process it – although Durant pushes his diet to the extreme and is willing to even look like a caveman, while Pollan champions farmers markets and retains his Berkley professor persona.

Now, the big question: how far is far enough? While Pollan and Durant make some sense in the abstract, eliminating everything that is at all processed leaves virtually nothing left to eat in modern American society. For the purposes of the Pounds Off Playoff, let’s define processed foods as all processed, or refined, carbohydrates (white bread, white pasta, sweets, etc.), as well as other highly processed foods, such as lunchmeat and American cheese. We’ll knock out non-caloric foods as well, such as diet colas. However, we’ll allow some of those things that grandma would recognize (the sweet, beloved grandma who served romaine with olive oil and vinegar, not the awesome, beloved grandma who served pizza with gin and tonic), even if the cavemen wouldn’t know some of them.

Bottom line: When in doubt, err on the side of whole foods, or as close as possible.

Week 8 Recap: The Diet Eve Feast

Week 4 Loss: +1.8 Pounds
Total Loss: 11.4 Pounds

Game 2 Final: 8:00 Curfew -2.7, Write it all Down +1
8:00 Curfew advances to the quarter finals.
Write it all Down is eliminated.

The 8:00 Curfew is for real. How can I say this after a week where I gained? It was effective over the two week period, and would have been even more so if I didn’t sabotage it at the end with some diet pitfalls. See if these sound familiar.

The Diet Eve Feast. It’s a strange brew of nostalgia and empowerment – nostalgia, because you want to eat those foods you’re going to lose one more time before you have to say goodbye, and empowerment, because you’re so sure your forthcoming diet is going to be THE ANSWER that you can certainly afford to pack on extra calories the night before, right? I can’t tell you how many Diet Eve feasts I’ve enjoyed, but I’m pretty confident they alone account for a pants size.

Gaming the System. It’s the difference between following the letter of the law and following the spirit of the law, and for me it’s a common problem when it comes to dieting.

So how did the Diet Eve feast and gaming the system sabotage this week for the 8:00 Curfew? Simply, I ate a lot in the last 90 minutes the last few nights. The spirit of the 8:00 Curfew is to stop eating after dinner and dessert, but towards the end of the two weeks, I just kept going until the bell tolled at 8:00. Thankfully, I did stop by 8:00 (or 9:00, see below), and had that 10 to 12 hour recovery period, but the damage was done.

Last night was Diet Eve. I have back to back eating plans coming up that are from the Whole Foods Region: no processed foods and no whites. Yesterday’s fare included lots of stuff that (sigh, for dramatic effect) I won’t be able to eat for a month – sweets, chips, lots of stuff.

In conclusion, I think the 8:00 curfew is a pretty good one. It does present some challenges, as I had at least five evenings in the past two weeks with either kid events or work meetings that caused me to choose among imperfect options: finishing eating for the day before 6:00, eating fast food prior to 8:00, or eating better food and extending to 9:00. I tried all three, and none was particularly satisfying. But having a “hard stop” at 8:00 generally was a good thing.

Coaching point: An eating plan has to be comprehensive to work. It’s just too tempting to take advantage of big loopholes in diets that have large “no rules” periods.

Sunday, March 7, 2010

Week 7 Recap: Is the Pounds Off Playoff Scientific?

Week 7 Loss: -4.5
Total Loss: -13.2

I’ve had a number of questions from friends about how to deal with the vagaries of weight loss in this contest. One person asked me how I deal with it being easier to lose the first few pounds than to lose the rest later on. Others have wondered about the things that vary from day to day, such as water weight. What they are really asking: “Is the Pounds off Playoff scientific?”

The quick answer to those questions is “no”. There are too many variables that can’t be controlled for. Some weeks are extra stressful at work, or you’re travelling, or there’s a pizza party, or you have the flu. Sometimes you are doing active tasks that burn calories without formally working out, and sometimes you’re chained to your laptop so long you can’t get any exercise at all. The two biggest “threats” to the scientific process are (1) that normal weight variation from day to day is large relative to weekly weight loss and (2) that I’m just one guy. If I had a huge research budget, I’d hire a few hundred others to replicate the P.O.P. Then, the hiccups of the process would even out and this would be scientific.

The longer answer to this question is “somewhat”. All scientific studies have some measurement error. And the P.O.P. has some mechanisms to control for known problems with diets. For example, the two diets in each “game” are tested in consecutive two week periods, so that both are in the same approximate phase of weight loss. And I have taken steps to stabilize my water intake and weigh-ins. (If my digital scale doesn’t give the same reading three times in a row, I start over until it does.) The other benefit of this process is heightened observation, which in itself is a marker of the scientific process. I am more in tune with the relationship of what I put into my body, and how I conduct my life, than ever before.

As long as I’m losing weight, I don’t really care if the P.O.P. is perfectly scientific. Frankly, single elimination tournaments aren’t designed to be fair. They are designed to be entertaining and dramatic and to hold our attention, but there would be a different approach if the goal were a scientific identification of the true winner. Just ask the Minnesota Vikings, who missed the Super Bowl, despite having the best record in their conference, with the game being decided in large part by a coin flip. (BTW, the NFL is considering changing its overtime rules – finally – but they’ll never consider my favorite proposal.)

So did I really gain 3.1 pounds last week and lose 4.5 pounds this week? Doubtful. It was another stressful week at work and I didn’t feel particularly healthy, battling a crushing grant deadline. I had too much caffeine Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday (the grant was due Friday night), which made me irritable on Saturday. Thankfully, though, I never ate after 8:45 (most days I finished between 6:00 and 8:00, but I had a couple of late dinners) and it seemed to help. This week shouldn’t be as crazy and I’m looking forward to getting a better feel for the 8:00 curfew.

Coaching point: I just heard a broadcaster speculate that Americans don’t like to watch soccer because the action doesn’t stop so spectators can eat! The lesson this week is that you really don’t have to always eat. I was no saint at the plate this week, but having several hours before bed without food seems to have made all the difference.