Monday, February 28, 2011

What Should I Do Next?

Redford in The Candidate: "What do we do now?"

Last week, I noted that both the Pounds Off Playoff tournament and the Big Climb finish on March 20th, and I'm finally having to face a big question:

What should I do next?

I'd like your thoughts, but first, here's what I know for sure:

  • I'm not done blogging. I've already decided to continue the blog, so this isn't a fishing expedition for you to encourage me to keep blogging. Likewise, don't bother telling me to quit, Statler and Waldorf style. I'm not going anywhere.
  • My goal is to lose more weight after the P.O.P. than during it. I am nowhere near the weight loss I need to be healthy. 
  • I'd like to in some way build on the P.O.P. Part of the point of the P.O.P. was to learn what does and doesn't work for me, so I could move forward with what does.
  • I'm open to another fitness "event", though any fitness adventure would do. Last spring, I joined a fairly serious softball team after 20 years of not playing. Last summer, I went for a new PR every week on our community bike trail. Right now, I'm training to climb Seattle's Columbia Tower for charity. All have kept me engaged and moving. What's next?
  • I won't babysit your kids. Not that they aren't the cutest kids ever, of course. Seriously, let's keep this focused on health, fitness, and blogging.

The ask: Please use the comments below to suggest where you think I should go from here when the "tournament" ends in three weeks and I have finished The Big Climb. I've had many ideas for moving forward over the last few months - most of which I've discarded - but I'll keep those to myself for now. I want to hear your best ideas, free of my guidance.

If you're relatively new to my blog, check out my eating plan power rankings to see how I faired on each of the 16 eating plans, as well as my posts on stair climbing and biking. The three links will give you an idea of what has worked for me over the past year.

What do you think will work for me for the next year? I'm eager to read your ideas!

Friday, February 25, 2011

Stuff I Read Friday

This week's material is thematic to both The Big Climb and my current 2500 Calories plan. Next week I'll be delightfully random again, I promise. To the links!

Apparently there's a stair climbing sub-culture out there. Have you seen "The Fight Club," or at least know the premise? In Seattle there's the Flight Club and their 7 Rules of Flight Club totally cracked me up (especially #6).

Want to know what 2500 calories looks like in terms of real food? I'm not the type to post a bite-by-bite record of my eating, but I know some of you want that. If you want to see a sensible example of what a week of eating 2500 calories per day looks like, check out this resource from UNC.

If you want to see what 2500 calories in one item at a fast food restaurant looks like, here it is in all of its pizza burger glory. (warning: just looking at it gave me a stomach ache)

Monday, February 21, 2011

In the Home Stretch

Sunday marked dual milestones: Exactly one month to The Big Climb and the beginning of the Pounds Off Playoff Championship Game!

Inspiring view of the Cascades from atop my training stairs


Big Climb Update: Training is going well for The Big Climb. I'm now over 1100 steps and I'm on track to hit 1311 by the end of February. Saturday I headed out at 8:00 AM to hike the 68 stairs at our neighborhood school. The weather was a mixed blessing: crystal clear, but only 34 degrees! It made for stunning views from atop the stairs, but it was the first time I never got warm enough to remove my sweatshirt midway through the session. Can't complain, though...prefer the cold to rain this time of year.

Most importantly, my many very generous friends and co-workers have gotten us up $1,674 raised for the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society! That's just absolutely amazing. Thanks to all of you, including a few friends from the blogosphere! If you're still interested in donating, here's the link. It's easy, and for a great cause.

Pounds Off Playoff Update: After 56 weeks of single-elimination play...

...2500 Calories per Day and Three Strikes have reached the Finals!

2500 Calories per Day has been the strongest plan throughout, registering 17.6 pounds lost over six total weeks. That was aided by a six pound loss the very first week of the POP, but even accounting for that I've averaged over two pounds a week loss on 2500 Calories. The plan seems to hit the sweet spot for me. It's enough that I don't feel hungry, yet low enough for a person my current size to lose weight pretty fast. And if you're wondering, 2500 Calories is what the BMI charts say I would need to maintain the "healthy" weight for my height. All this adds up to 2500 Calories being the odd-on favorite to win The Pounds Off Playoff.

Meanwhile, Three Strikes has survived its match-up with 8:00 Curfew to assume the underdog role in the final. Three Strikes may not end up providing the precision necessary to win, as my internal "umpire" was calling a tight strike zone the last two weeks. In plain English, I was too lenient, especially when I was tired or stressed. Some things that could have been strikes I let slide and other things that we big enough to be two strikes I counted as one. It wasn't a disaster, but I basically broke even over the last two weeks (+0.4 pounds). Only a total collapse by 8:00 Curfew allowed Three Strikes to survive and reach the Finals.

Looking ahead: The next month will see both the exciting conclusion of the Pounds Off Playoff and The Big Climb on March 20th. Check back every Monday for more updates and once again, thanks for all of your support!

Friday, February 18, 2011

Stuff I Read Friday

Before we get to the links, check this out. Piers Steel, author of The Procrastination Equation, stopped by my Monday review and left some tips specific to weight loss in the comments:
____
Thanks for the review! Appreciate it, though don't forget a few other techniques.

There are many forms of precommitment, such as asking the waiter at the START of dinner not to bring any dessert menus. Another form of precommitment would be food destruction, used by no less than Jillian Michaels: http://www.hangrypants.com/2010/03/food-destruction-helpful-hints-or-disordered-eating/

Similarly, don't forget the example in the book where secretaries ate twice as much when the candy bowl was clear compared to when it was opaque. The more tangible and concrete temptations are, the harder they are to resist. 

Might be fun for us to talk about how to specifically apply the Procrastination Equation to weight loss. It's help me considerably.

Again, great post! 
___

Thanks, Piers. And now, to the links!

It's time for the annual parade of "he's in the best shape of his life" spring training stories. Yankees rotund ace C.C. Sabathia has lost 30 pounds or so, and he did it by not eating Captain Crunch by the box! And Pablo Sandoval, a.k.a. "Kung Foo Panda", is looking "fit as a fiddle", minus 30 pounds of fat. Of course, we've seen this before. I told you last year about Panda's weight loss, and his hitting dropped below league average for the first time in his career. 


I love a short article with good health advice. OK, so maybe it's not a revelation that walking is good for you, but studies help us understand why, and expanding your hippocampus (memory) as you age is a pretty cool benefit of a daily constitutional.

From the inspiration department, all I can say is "wow". A high school pitcher with not one, but two prosthetic legs, and good "stuff", as they say. Not sure what his coach was thinking in cutting him, but maybe there's more to the story.

Monday, February 14, 2011

Review: The Procrastination Equation

I am engaged in a weight loss journey and the real treat of it is gaining insights into human nature. Why do we sometimes do things that are not in our best interest? How does our environment affect our choices? Can we reverse habits and behaviors that keep us from reaching our potential? What behaviors truly lead to health and weight loss?

Based on over a year of reading thousands of posts on weight loss blogs, I have a pretty strong hypothesis that two behaviors are common to all weight loss success stories: getting started and never giving up. The latter is a combination of optimism, tenacity, and resilience. But what about getting started? With so many Americans with so much to lose, why don't they get started? And why didn't I get started for so long?

It was in that spirit that I picked up The Procrastination Equation: How to Stop Putting Things Off and Start Getting Stuff Done. Piers Steel, author and University of Calgary professor, is an expert in the field of procrastination. This book is based on Steel's meta-analysis (a statistical synthesis of research) of the substantial academic study of procrastination. His book is a worthy read and will give you insights into your behavior and the behavior of others.

Ironically, the book plays out as the opposite of the procrastination curves he so cleverly illustrates in its pages. While the productivity of a procrastinator stays very low over time, swooping to a sudden peak approaching a deadline, this book is fast out of the gate, only to settle into a pedestrian pace. After the first few chapters bring new clarity to the understanding of procrastination, the remainder revisits concepts that are known by readers familiar with the topic. But I did learn a great deal, which I'll focus on here.

First, the equation. Steel lays out a simple mathematical equation to express the likelihood of procrastination:

Expectancy x Value
Impulsiveness x Delay

With a quick definition of terms, the formula makes sense. To friends and co-workers I've shared it with, naming the components of procrastination strikes a chord on an intuitive level:
  • Expectancy - the belief one has that he or she will be successful on a task
  • Value - whether or not the task is perceived to be worthwhile
  • Impulsiveness - how prone one is to distraction and impulsive behavior
  • Delay - the amount of time before the task is due

Put succinctly, the more you value a task and think you can succeed at it, the sooner you'll get started. On the other hand, the farther off the due date is and the more impulsive you are when presented with distractions, the later you'll get started.

Steel illustrates this with a resonant example: the college term paper assignment, which he calls the "perfect storm" of procrastination. A term paper is assigned at the beginning of the semester, due at the end of the semester (delay). Students know that grading is subjective, making them uncertain they will get a good mark regardless how much they work on it (expectancy). To the student, the paper itself represents little more than a hoop to be jumped through (value). And along the way, friends, Facebook, dating, and a cable TV marathon of the student's favorite show all offer more immediate reward than starting the paper (impulsiveness). By the time the student starts writing in earnest, he's faced with an all-nighter and the product is less than his best work.

I shared this scenario recently in a meeting where we are redesigning our organization's annual improvement planning document. Every year, we assign it to all of our key leaders nearly six months before it is due, and every year we are inundated with requests for extensions the week before it is due. It never made sense, until reading Steel's book and realizing we had inadvertently contributed to the procrastination by introducing delay to the equation. In fact, establishing short-term goals and deadlines is probably the single most useful lesson of the book. 

The Procrastination Equation is full of insights into human nature and the nature of procrastination. For one, you will also learn that perfectionism is not a cause of procrastination, though it is widely thought of that way. Don't believe it? Then ask yourself if perfectionists tent to be organized or disorganized. Of course, perfectionists are organized, and procrastinators generally aren't. (It may be that "I didn't start out of fear of not being perfect" is really a form of self-doubt, a.k.a. expectancy, and I'm surprised Steel doesn't make this connection explicitly.)

Steel's writing is colorful and maintains your attention. I particularly enjoyed his passage on the delay device that's built into most bedroom clocks: 
"The snooze button is the devil's device, a procrastination-enabling technology that lets you easily put off your original goal of waking up, in order to grab a few more minutes of low quality slumber."
We know we should get up, but push that snooze button anyway. I'm speaking hypothetically, of course!  But that leads to another lesson of the book.

Not all delay is procrastination. One of the first objectives of the book is to inform the reader that it's irrational delay that constitutes procrastination. Putting things off isn't procrastination, if you have a good reason, such as "I'll cut the lawn when it's not raining." Delay becomes procrastination when you know you are sabotaging yourself, but you do it anyway. 

That's a good segue back to diet and health. Though Steel gives only passing mention to the relationship of procrastination to weight issues, he does name health among the areas of life that suffer at the hands of procrastination. Clearly, we know overeating and lack of exercise works against us, but we indulge in that irrational behavior anyway, postponing healthy choices for another day.

My own meaning making is that people fall into two procrastination traps that get in the way of weight loss. First, folks don't start. Health consequences of the extra pounds are too far down the road and we're all wired for immediate gratification. "I'll start tomorrow," becomes the mantra. Second, once started there is a daily battle with temptations that vie for our impulsive nature - the distractions that crowd out exercise and tempting foods that are ubiquitous in our culture.

The Procrastination Equation provides no new silver bullets to tackle these challenges, but the unifying theme of "set short-term goals" helps. You can make healthy choices gain the immediacy of the candy dish at the receptionist's desk or the social networking that keeps you out of the gym. For some of us, blogging helps. For others it's Weight Watchers, consistent use of the bathroom scale, or training for an event.

Steel recommends approaching procrastination as a habit that can be rebuilt, one step at a time, with small moves that add up over time to big changes. His book is not about weight loss, but it may help you understand why you sometimes act against your own long-term best interest. It'll bring you back to the lessons of our fellow weight loss bloggers. Get started. Be accountable in short-term increments. Keep going. And never give up. 

Friday, February 11, 2011

Stuff I Read Friday

My wife wanted pizza for dinner earlier in the week and I was fine with that. It's a guaranteed two strikes - one for "eating out" and one for seconds - but I could plan for it, so it's OK. In fact, we agreed on half cheese/half pepperoni for the kids and gourmet veggie de-lite thin crust for us.  But look what Papa Murphy's makes now: S'mores Pizza. One of my kids suggested we take one to grandma's lake house with the fire pit.  This is wrong, very wrong.




To the links!

Who knew doing The Big Climb would be the easy way out? If my dad was successful in moving our family to Toronto in the 1980s, I might have been signed up to climb the CN Tower instead.  That's 1776 stairs (versus 1311 in the Seattle version). Hey Raegun and Andrew, maybe you should sign up! At least it's in metric.

Climbing the Empire State Building's not easy, either. Try 86 floors and over 1500 stairs.  Ms. B.C. did, and her account of it is almost as impressive as the very cool medal she received at the top.

A man found a video tape of the first Super Bowl in his relative's attic, the first known recording of that telecast. That was just 45 years ago, which blows my mind, considering how much is recorded today - security cameras, digital content of every kind, etc.  Every email at my work must be archived, by law, so the  "Any items left in the staff room refrigerator past Friday will be thrown out" email will be preserved, while Max McGee's touchdown was almost lost to the sands of time.

Here's a touching story about a man receiving his MBA diploma while hospitalized with a terminal disease.

Monday, February 7, 2011

Final Four Update: Lifting the Curfew

"Dad, aren't you supposed to be on a diet?"

I got this more than once during the past two weeks.

"No eating after 8:00," I replied meekly.

The truth is, you never would have known I was on a diet by watching me eat the last two weeks. My plan  was "No Eating After 8:00." I've thought of it since Oprah touted an eating curfew as her secret weapon, back when she had lost a lot of weight (can I say this and still seem masculine?). But the problem is, the curfew can't do it by itself.

In theory, it makes sense: you create a period of nearly 12 hours between meals (between dinner and breakfast the next day) that limits your daily caloric intake and keeps you from late night snacking on chips, ice cream, and all the bad stuff we tend to eat at 10:00 PM.

In reality, I just replaced the eating I used to do from 8:00-11:00 with eating from 5:00-8:00. Lots of ice cream consumption, pretzels, and so forth. The worst part is that I was doing much of this in front of my kids. And the second worst part was that I really felt crappy, the kind of "OCing" (an overdose of carbohydrates) that I used to do before the P.O.P.  I felt so bad on Friday night I decided to start the "Three Strikes" plan a day early, just to regain a sense of control over my eating.

A cheesesteak similar to Shannon's (Flickr)
Here's a great contrast between how "8:00 Curfew" and "Three Strikes" work under similar circumstances. Two weeks ago, we hosted the AFC and NFC Championship party for my fantasy football league. By "we", I mean Shannon made cheeseteaks (at my request - she makes great ones), leaving the ingredients in the mother of all crock pots (separate sections for the meat, peppers/onions, and Cheese Whiz) and promptly departing for the home of another football widow.

Of course, the cheesesteaks were hardly the only food on hand. There was also three pizzas and boatloads of snackfoods and sweets that the other guys brought. Long story short, the games ran from noon to 7:00 PM Pacific Time, and with no limitations other than the 8:00 curfew, I ate throughout. And felt miserable after.

Yesterday, in contrast, was the Super Bowl. We all went over to a party hosted by close friends of ours. The spread of food was no less impressive. But this time, I had Three Strikes on my side. I ate a normal, reasonably healthy breakfast and lunch and arrived at the party at 3:00 Pacific with all my "strikes" in tact. I still ate plenty and enjoyed the party experience, but there was a defined beginning and end. It's what I need. If will power and intuitive eating worked for me, it would have worked a long time ago.

In the end, I gained two and a half pounds on 8:00 Curfew over the past two weeks. A little of that might be muscle from my stair training, but clearly I took a step back. The curfew concept isn't a bad one, it's just not enough on it's own. I need a system with no loopholes. I now have two weeks to find out if Three Strikes will be that system. Right now, it's the odds on favorite to face 2500 Calories in the finals.

Sunday, February 6, 2011

Amazing Generosity!

I wasn't planning to post today, but I just have to note the AMAZING GENEROSITY of so many friends and family members.  Together, we have raised $999 so far for The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society!  I'm sore from my 1156 stair training session yesterday, but after seeing the new total, there's no question this is worth it.

Thanks to all of you for your generosity!!! And if you'd like to join in, just go to my fundraising page on The Big Climb website.

Friday, February 4, 2011

Stuff I Read Friday

To the links!

The government has some new advice for us. Eat fewer calories, consume less salt, reduce processed foods, and fill half your plate with fruits and vegetables. Hey, everything I write is copyrighted, yes? Lawsuit!

The U.S. is 28th in among high income countries for life expectancy. A ranking like that for our schools would cause a storm of criticism of our education system. Why isn't this happening for the things that are causing a shorter lifespan?

Perhaps you've heard that one study found that Taco Bell beef is only 35% beef, with other filler. Stephen Colbert has something to say about that (video), and he's as funny as ever.

Here's a must read article for parents of boys considering playing football. The New Yorker's Ben McGrath gives magnum opus treatment to new discoveries on brain damage caused by years of blocking and tackling. It's very disturbing, frankly. For a shorter treatment, watch McGrath's video or Slate's quick read on the subject. Very curious what Dr. F would say about this, as a rabid football fan, mom of a school football player, and a physician.

Have you ever wondered why the home team always seems to have an advantage in sports? Turns out it's not what you think - the cheering of your rabid fans, the difficulties of travel, etc. - but rather the refs are biased for the hometown teams. (Hat tip and best wishes to: Rob Neyer)